10/27/2022 0 Comments Windows vista extreme liteThen there's beta releases of video card drivers and the like. (You used to be able to specify in the mbr to always use them, but MS released at least 2 critical updates that disabled that) Perhaps this isn't an issue for the average Joe, but there's a decent number of aps out there that I use that utilize an unsigned driver. and some of those games are good enough that horrible dated graphics don't matter.ģ) The 64-bit version of Vista requires you to specify EVERY TIME YOU BOOT that you want to use unsigned drivers. I dunno about you, but sometimes I get nostalgic for the games I grew up with. There's a lot of speculation that it's related to the integrated DRM stuff Vista includes.Ģ) The 64-bit version of Vista removes backwards compatability for 16-bit applications. #WINDOWS VISTA EXTREME LITE 64 BIT#This is an issue with both 32 and 64 bit versions. Meaning that if I want to have a decent racing sim setup I've got to go back to XP. so a full-screen racing or flight sim would span all your displays not just one. (well, more of they changed things up so that it's impossible for drivers supporting that to be written) If you're not aware of these modes, horizontal span mode for example allowed your software to treat your collection of displays as one really wide display. There's others, but I either haven't personally run into them, or they're not particularly painful.ġ) Vista removed support for horizontal or vertical span modes with a multi-monitor setup. Here's the ones that I've run into as being major issues in my 4-5 months with Vista. there's negative features in Vista as well (especially the 64-bit version). Just to help keep your viewpoint balanced. The pros are mostly pros on paper where the cons are immeadeately obvious, even for normal users. Yes, Vista is better than XP in some aspects, but as a whole the OS just offers less than XP for many if not most. Even Microsofts own latest Flight Simulator which was to be a DX10 showcase performs better on XP, and is visually nearly the same (checkout the various FS forums for more anecdotal evidence). Review and gamesites show time and time again Vista with DX10 is slower when compared to the same game on the same machine with DX9, and the benefits are minimal. With Aero being enabled if possible automatically by the OS, and being an order of magnitude more resource consuming than for example OSX and Compiz, the OS is indeed much more sluggish than XP or some others.Īnd let us not talk about the performance benefits of DX10 over DX9. The GUI is definitely part of the GUI, or were you trying to argue otherwise? The OS is in this case Microsoft Windows Vista in it's entirety, not some arbitrary pieces of it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |